Blogging The Casbah: 2012-03-18

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Regional War

Interesting piece a few days ago in the New York Times. The summery is that most simulations of an Israeli strike on Iran would lead to a regional war. Sounds nice, no?

A classified war simulation held this month to assess the repercussions of an Israeli attack on Iran forecasts that the strike would lead to a wider regional war, which could draw in the United States and leave hundreds of Americans dead, according to American officials.

So yes, by "regional" they mean that the US could get involved. In fact, David Axe, of the epically cool blog, War is Boring, suggests that it'll be the smaller US navy that will do most of the fighting.

Small ships have never really been the Navy’s thing. Tasked with deploying all over the world, far from its U.S. shipyards, the Navy prefers big vessels capable of carrying lots of fuel and supplies and taking a beating on long ocean crossings. The average size of an American destroyer has more than doubled since the early 1990s, now tipping the scales at 9,000 tons displacement.

But small ships have an edge in certain situations. For one, they can safely sail in shallow waters and get closer to an enemy’s coastline.

So, stand by. Hopefully all this posturing means that everyone is just leveraging for a better diplomatic solution. Otherwise . . . get ready for a mess.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Will Hezbollah automaticly attack Israel if Israel attacks Iran?

Will Israel attack Iran? Jesus, who knows. There are too many moving parts to say with any certainty. One of these "moving parts" is that the Israelis have to consider Hezbollah in Lebanon, and if Iran is hit, what will Hezbollah's response be like. Moreover, will Iran's first rate terrorist apparatus all across the Middle East strike American and Israeli targets with straight orders from Tehran?

Over at Small Wars Journal, Kip Whittington, thinks that Hezbollah will only attack Israel if it feels that the Israelis are going for regime change in Tehran.

An Israeli strike against the Iranian nuclear program, while destabilizing, does not threaten Hezbollah's chief sponsor in the region, and thus would not trigger an automatic response. As he notes in his piece, "Hezbollah would have to 'sit down and think about it.'"

Here is what Whittington says:

In the middle of a region experiencing unprecedented change, a question lingers: Will Israel attack Iran? As a result, a flurry of writings have appeared attempting to answer this pertinent question. A "yes" comes with a list of consequences of which the most troubling is the threat of an escalating regional conflict. In the middle of this regional war it is said that the most powerful non-state actor in the Middle East, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, would be a key player.

Conventional wisdom amongst analysts suggests that Hezbollah, acting as an Iranian proxy, will retaliate against Israel. While certainly a possibility, policy-makers should recognize that today's Hezbollah is fundamentally different from the one that fought Israel for 34-days during the summer of 2006. Members can no longer afford to take actions that don’t pass a cost-benefit test. Recent remarks by Hassan Nasrallah best reflect this altered strategic calculus. The Secretary General declared that if Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities, Hezbollah’s leadership would have to “sit down, think and decide what to do.” This seemingly uncharacteristic remark can be attributed to two factors: 1) Hezbollah is now the strongest political actor in the Lebanese government; and 2) both Hezbollah and the state of Lebanon will incur a massive retaliatory military campaign by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Therefore, Hezbollah will only undertake military action against its historic enemy if Israel pursues a policy that harms the organization’s vital geostrategic interests -- primarily regime change in Iran. As long as Hezbollah retains both a political and military wing, they will still require Iran’s ideological, military and financial assistance. With uncertain days ahead for their other ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, ties between Iran and Hezbollah will only strengthen.